Skip to main content

Services

Discovery, specs, prototypes & handoff

You are about to spend on build. Do you know exactly what to build, what to cut, and why — before a developer writes a single line?

AI tools can generate outputs fast. Building the wrong thing fast is still expensive. I bring more than a decade of design, systems, and product thinking to generate the right questions, the right frameworks, and a clear "build this, not that" direction — before the spend begins. Or I surface that the timing or approach needs to change, which is a valuable outcome in its own right.

I work with owner-led businesses that need rigour before they commit to build. If you have ever watched a project stall because requirements were unclear — or you are determined not to find out the hard way — this is the right entry point. Engagements are scoped and time-boxed so you get a validated direction without a multi-year programme.

How I work: Most of the collaboration is asynchronous — written questions, shared documents, structured exercises you complete on your timeline, and review rounds. I do my focused work outside typical office hours, so we agree check-in points rather than defaulting to live workshops or full-day facilitation. Short calls happen when they genuinely help; they are not the backbone of the engagement.

Build partners

For developers and build partners

If you build software for others or work in a studio, the outputs are the same: clear requirements and documentation you can use to quote, plan, and build — which helps the business paying for the work and the people doing the implementation. I treat this as collaboration between peers, not as one side "fixing" the other.

How we might work together

  1. Referral

    Someone needs discovery or a spec before you quote or start build; I take that piece and hand back material you can work from.

  2. Joint project

    You stay on as the build partner; I take discovery, specification, or prototype, then we hand off with clear boundaries.

  3. Tighter scope

    Requirements were never clear, or they changed after work began; a focused engagement can align documentation and priorities so you can move forward with confidence.

Get in touch with how you prefer to collaborate — solo developer, studio, or in-house team — whether that is a referral, subcontracting, or a single scoped engagement.

Engagements

What I offer

We agree the exact slice before we start. Below is the usual shape — most engagements combine two or more of these.

Discovery and requirements

Outcome: Clear, prioritised requirements your developers (or a partner) can estimate from.

What it can include: Story-style mapping of who the product serves and what matters first; how the main parts of the domain fit together — via async prompts, documents, and your inputs on your timeline.

Out of scope: Aims at a buildable picture, not open-ended research or enterprise-style procurement theatre.

Specs and product briefs

Outcome: A brief stakeholders can align on before build — problem, scope, priorities, and what “done” means for the first release.

What you get: Plain-language documentation your team and build partner can use to quote and plan.

Out of scope: Legal, security, and compliance sign-off stay with you; I flag where those voices need to join the conversation.

Prototyping

Outcome: Something clickable that proves the core workflow before you invest in production code — less build risk, clearer demos for stakeholders or users.

What it can include: Focused slice (for example a mobile-friendly web app on the critical path). The prototype proves the workflow — your development partner can extend or rebuild in a stack that fits your situation, with the spec as the anchor.

Out of scope: Validates the critical path — not full edge-case coverage or production hardening.

Handoff to build

Outcome: Build does not start from a blank page — scope, priorities, artefacts, and open questions are explicit.

Details: I shape the package for your preferred build partner, or we align an introduction after discovery if you want one — say so when we scope.

Out of scope: Ongoing delivery, engineering, and maintenance stay with your team or partner; my role is structured handoff, not day-to-day build management.

Out of scope

Who this is not for

I am deliberate about scope so expectations stay clear. The list below is not exhaustive, but it is a fair picture of what I do not take on.

  • Businesses looking for cheap design work or a low-cost MVP builder
  • Full-time embedded product ownership inside your company
  • Hands-on production engineering or long-term maintenance (that sits with your dev team or partner)
  • Big-agency retainers or open-ended "just be our product person" arrangements

If you are not sure whether your need fits, get in touch — a short message is enough to find out.